Had a few folks ask me recently about Dum-Dum bullets.
Let’s see what we can find out about them on the Internet:
“The ‘dum-dum’ was a British military bullet developed for use in India – at the Dum-Dum Arsenal – on the North West Frontier in the late 1890s.
The dum-dum comprised a jacketed .303 bullet with the jacket nose open to expose its lead core. The aim was to improve the bullet’s effectiveness by increasing its expansion upon impact.
The phrase ‘dum-dum’ was later taken to include any soft-nosed or hollow pointed bullet. The Hague Convention of 1899 outlawed the use of dum-dum bullets during warfare.”
Some folks have heard rumors of soldiers and others cutting an “X” in the nose of pistol bullets to “improve” performance.
Today’s question: Does altering the nose of a bullet make it more effective against living targets?
Tman cut an “X” in the nose of a couple of rounds of 9mm Ball and .45 ACP Ball, and I cut an “X” in a .38 Special RNL bullet.
Here they are.
Would this “improve” the bullet’s performance?
Only one way to find out.
We will try them against the Waterbox O’Truth.
It shed its jacket and lost the “petals”, but the core of the bullet remained intact.
How about the .45 ACP Dum-Dum, out of my Springfield 1911?
Lastly, let’s try the .38 Special round out of my Colt Python.
Let’s look at some rifle rounds.
These were the first Dum-Dum bullets.
I took a standard .30-06 Military ball, 150 grain bullet and used a hack saw to cut off the nose of the bullet and expose the lead inside. I then used a Dremel tool to smooth-up the surface.
Just a word of caution…
Any time you are shooting a round that is “open” on both ends, there is a possibility of the lead leaving the weapon and the jacket getting stuck in the rifling.
Always be sure to check the bore for obstructions before the next shot.
Let’s see how it works against the water jugs.
Here I am shooting it out of my 1903-A3 Springfield.
Water rained down all over me.
Another method of “improving” a standard ball cartridge was to pull the bullet and seat it backwards in the case.
Elmer Keith, an old gun writer, tried this and even shot big game with the rounds during the Depression when bullets were hard to come by. Keith reported that the bullets seemed to be “just as accurate” out to 200 yards, much to his surprise. He also said that they killed deer and elk just fine.
To pull a bullet, you need to know a little “trick”.
Military ball is sealed with an asphalt sealer to prevent moisture leakage into the powder. You must first break this seal or the bullets are very difficult to pull.
To do this, you set your seating die about 1/16 inch deeper than the full length of the round.
Run the round into the die and it will push the bullet back about 1/16th of an inch and break the seal. Then, the bullet is easier to pull.
I then reversed the bullets and seated then over the original powder charge.
We will shoot them into the Waterbox O’Truth and see what happens.
- Cutting “x”s in bullets is harder than you might imagine.
- It might make them slightly more effective than Ball, but not nearly as effective as modern Jacketed Hollow Points.
- The .45 ACP did not expand at all. This is probably the result of a much thicker jacket than the 9mm.
- The lead .38 Special shed its petals, but didn’t expand at all.
- Cutting the end off a rifle Ball cartridge will definitely make the bullet expand or break up. Would this make it more lethal? Probably. But not as much as a modern JSP (Jacketed Soft Point) bullet.
- Reversing a Ball bullet will cause it to expand and break up. Old Elmer said that it killed game just fine. But Elmer didn’t have access to modern JSP ammo. If he had, I’m sure he would have preferred it.
Oh well, a fine, if hot, day at the range.
It’s still fun to shoot stuff, even with Dum-Dums. smilie
Thanks to Tman for the help and thanks to my buddy Houston Husker for financing the purchase of all that water.